pimpy, c'mon aren't you an political science major?
greetings, fellow internet!
pimpy, c'mon aren't you an political science major?
War? Oh, you mean the Iraq invasion... got you now...
Fuck... Ass... Titty Licker... Crusty Lil Fucker... Mmm Kay...
So was Mom. So was Dad. As far as I recall, our whole family, except for 2 unchurched uncles, were radical fundamentalists who professed a naïve belief in the whole Word of God.
And here's the bizarre part: Not one of us misfits has been observed to strap a belt of explosives to ourselves and blow ourselves up in a crowded bus terminal.
That's because of a little-known fact, namely, that Christian fundamentalists typically exercise their religion and influence the political process peacefully.
money does unlock vast amounts of knowledge you're obviously too poor to have acquired.
Actually I make perfect sense. Liberals are the ones that claim "not all X are bad", having us pick and choose. These same liberals are the ones that get butt hurt when you use a politically incorrect term like "faggot". The point is that liberals are a walking contradiction.
you act like your generalizations are supposed to be accepted as truth, when in fact theyre narrow and usually based purely on assumptions. in no way, shape, or form is "not all x are bad" a part of liberal ideology, so to connect those 2 is intellectually dishonest and lazy. learn what "liberal" actually means before you characterize it because your picture of "liberal" (probably cindy sheehan protesting the war or some shit like that) is one manifestation of how people interpret liberalism, but it by no means defines the ideology.
i guess that works if you dont actually have to interact with people irl, but when faced with a situation where you have to actually consider ideas other than your own, youre going to have trouble
I agree with the dick riding faggot troll. just sayin
LOL wigger iTT bitch!
pimpy: tunnel vision
nore: die hard liberal
poo poo mcgee: die hard idiot
you better back off before i jack off
we're not in iraq for oil, thats a bunch of liberal bullshit.
"Americans like to believe in American exceptionalism, that the United States is a force for good around the world, not just another country pursuing its interests via geopolitical horse-trading. This is part of why there is such a visceral public backlash against WikiLeaks -- because it lays bare U.S. diplomacy in all its blunt, unromantic reality."
we invaded because we thought saddam had WMDs and chemical weapons since he did in the past. when we first got there we didnt side with the sunnis like we should have. they wouldve helped us end all of this bullshit a long time ago. now we're just trying to fix the bullshit. iraq doesn't even have enough oil for it to be worth it.
as mentioned before in this thread, why not go gung hoe about it with north korea? pakistan has a ton of nukes, we should just invade and destroy those sites.
and afghanistan was for? get em back for 911.. texan style? take a look at a map man, its no coincidence theres iran attack posturing now. its merely next on the list of oil rich countries to invade. (weve got em from the south [sea] east [afghanistan] and west [iraq])
the entire thing is a chess game being played out on a global scale for the last remaining oil reserves.
read a book, not cnn's babble about wmds.
"Americans like to believe in American exceptionalism, that the United States is a force for good around the world, not just another country pursuing its interests via geopolitical horse-trading. This is part of why there is such a visceral public backlash against WikiLeaks -- because it lays bare U.S. diplomacy in all its blunt, unromantic reality."
cnn's babble? i don't even watch the news because it's all bullshit.
and yet you believe the wmd story? interesting.
"Americans like to believe in American exceptionalism, that the United States is a force for good around the world, not just another country pursuing its interests via geopolitical horse-trading. This is part of why there is such a visceral public backlash against WikiLeaks -- because it lays bare U.S. diplomacy in all its blunt, unromantic reality."
"Americans like to believe in American exceptionalism, that the United States is a force for good around the world, not just another country pursuing its interests via geopolitical horse-trading. This is part of why there is such a visceral public backlash against WikiLeaks -- because it lays bare U.S. diplomacy in all its blunt, unromantic reality."
irl experiences.. and shit, even every single military poster here has shown to be completely ignorant and overly trusting of what their superiors tell them... topped off with a pompousness about their ignorance bc theyre 'on the front lines and see it how it is'. they truly do believe theyre there to help the iraqi people, fight them terrorists and spread democracy because its the only legitimate form of government.
"Americans like to believe in American exceptionalism, that the United States is a force for good around the world, not just another country pursuing its interests via geopolitical horse-trading. This is part of why there is such a visceral public backlash against WikiLeaks -- because it lays bare U.S. diplomacy in all its blunt, unromantic reality."
Bookmarks